What an excellent littl' 'short' slamming America's busy little fascist…Barack Hussein Obama.
FORMER Fetus
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
Monday, 25 February 2013
SCIENCE keeps helping the PRO-LIFE cause…
DON'T WORRY…new legislation protecting the unborn is coming, hardheads.
(Creatas-Getty Images)
Monday, 11 February 2013
Will CANADIAN Be Next Pope?
WITH THE UNEXPECTED resignation of Pope Benedict XVI by month's end, will Cardinal Marc Ouellet be the next Pope?
Friday, 1 February 2013
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Woman Ph.D …dares to use the forgotten science of Human Embryology to denounce Human Cloning and yes, people…subsequently abortion.
U.S. Supreme Court, Democratic Party, Planned Parenthood, all feminists everywhere are upset because science insists on being fact-based—so appeals to women's feeling states are no longer allowed…
"The last question is, "when does a human person begin?" As with public policy, any philosophical analysis of personhood must begin with and be based on the correct scientific facts. This is required for philosophical realism. Further, a thing acts or functions according to the kind of nature it has - or what it is. If a "human being" is a "rational animal"; if the term "rational" must include virtually the vegetative and sensitive powers; if all of its powers must be present together simultaneously with the body, with no splits - then personhood must begin when the human being begins - at fertilization (or cloning) - when the "matter" is already "appropriately organized". This actually matches the correct science: immediately at fertilization or cloning, specifically human enzymes and proteins are produced, and specifically human tissues and organs are continuously developed from fertilization or cloning on. Personhood, then, should be based on what something is, not on how one actually thinks or feels (merely functional definitions of a human person)."
"The last question is, "when does a human person begin?" As with public policy, any philosophical analysis of personhood must begin with and be based on the correct scientific facts. This is required for philosophical realism. Further, a thing acts or functions according to the kind of nature it has - or what it is. If a "human being" is a "rational animal"; if the term "rational" must include virtually the vegetative and sensitive powers; if all of its powers must be present together simultaneously with the body, with no splits - then personhood must begin when the human being begins - at fertilization (or cloning) - when the "matter" is already "appropriately organized". This actually matches the correct science: immediately at fertilization or cloning, specifically human enzymes and proteins are produced, and specifically human tissues and organs are continuously developed from fertilization or cloning on. Personhood, then, should be based on what something is, not on how one actually thinks or feels (merely functional definitions of a human person)."
ALABAMA Gets it Right…
ALABAMA gets it right.
“The U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion cases are an aberration to law and stand on an island by themselves, and that island will one day disappear.”
FORMER ABORTIONIST tells the truth…
FORMER ABORTIONIST tells the truth about abortion!
…TRUTH and HUMANITY not biggies for the Pro-Choice crowd.
SCIENCE backs the Pro-Life cause even though the 'Choice' mob rejects life science conclusions. No matter. God is Life. Those who kill humanity, created in his image, will pay the necessary price. The price for the unrepentant is eternal damnation.
I once talked to a woman who had procured for herself two abortions.
In brief, and in approximation, here's how the narrative went.
"You know, I don't really feel guilty…at all."
I responded, "Well, God is NOT going to condemn you based on your feelings.
You will be judged based on the your actions. You terminated two human lives. You broke the commandment, "Thou shall not murder." Who cares what you feel about it? Objectively, you ended two viable pregnancies through a process you chose, and followed through with."
"Well, my Baptist friend told me my children are now in Heaven…."
"Actually, they are more likely in a place of natural happiness…an adjunct, so to speak, of the eternal kingdom. They were not able to access the merits of the Cross, the salvific work of Jesus Christ, so they cannot enjoy the Beatific Vision."
"So…how…then is the outcome so bad…if they continue on in the next life, at least, near to Heaven…?"
"The aborted are not the ones in peril, you are! You haven't renounced your sin, or reconciled yourself to God. Every sin you hold onto, every sin you do not give over to the grace and mercy of God won through Jesus Christ…you must personally pay the price for. And the price is eternal death with emotional and bodily suffering in a permanent capacity.
God has given you a way out from all that; yes, but you must take it."
I told her to think and pray about all we discussed.
This is my rather truncated recollection of the event.
Conversion is a slow changeover usually…it rarely happens dramatically. The ascent of the mind, to the call of God's eternal truth. Grace precedes, and grace completes the actions of the postulant—
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)